Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sensors auxilary_datas in history, improve sensors display #1456

Open
fbeauKmi opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1608
Open

Add sensors auxilary_datas in history, improve sensors display #1456

fbeauKmi opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1608
Assignees
Labels
FR - Enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@fbeauKmi
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Moonraker has added units to sensor values and the ability to store sensor data in the job history.
https://moonraker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/configuration/#mqtt-sensor-configuration

Describe the solution you'd like

image

It could be interesting to obtain units in the sensors vue and get the information reported in the history panel.

Thanks,

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional information

An example of moonraker history output curl 'http://127.0.0.1:7125/server/history/list?limit=1&order=desc'| jq
history_request.json

@fbeauKmi fbeauKmi added the FR - Enhancement New feature or request label Jun 21, 2024
@fbeauKmi fbeauKmi changed the title Add sensors auxilary_datas in History, improve sensors display Add sensors auxilary_datas in history, improve sensors display Jun 21, 2024
@pedrolamas pedrolamas self-assigned this Feb 18, 2025
@pedrolamas pedrolamas added this to the 1.32.4 milestone Feb 18, 2025
@pedrolamas pedrolamas linked a pull request Feb 19, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FR - Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants