You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2023. It is now read-only.
I browsed DOSBox-Staging and DOSBox-X. Both have a "Publisher > See details link that goes to a contributions graph that makes it look like the former project has had no activity in 2021.
But this graph is not for the project, it's only for the building and presentation of the project's flatpak on Flathub! Continuing the example, dosbox-staging's actual contributions graph show vast contributions every week. Furthermore, you can't easily get from the relatively inconsequential commits to the flatpak to the actual code of an open source project.
Either replace/add to Publisher > See details with a link to the actual project (hard to do for closed-source flatpaks), or change the heading from "Publisher" to something suitably modest like "Packaging for Flathub". (Issue #214 mentions "Publisher" confusion.)
Thanks for flatpak tech and Flathub 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I browsed DOSBox-Staging and DOSBox-X. Both have a "Publisher > See details link that goes to a contributions graph that makes it look like the former project has had no activity in 2021.
But this graph is not for the project, it's only for the building and presentation of the project's flatpak on Flathub! Continuing the example, dosbox-staging's actual contributions graph show vast contributions every week. Furthermore, you can't easily get from the relatively inconsequential commits to the flatpak to the actual code of an open source project.
Either replace/add to Publisher > See details with a link to the actual project (hard to do for closed-source flatpaks), or change the heading from "Publisher" to something suitably modest like "Packaging for Flathub". (Issue #214 mentions "Publisher" confusion.)
Thanks for flatpak tech and Flathub 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: