Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gpt-3.5-turbo behaving differently #119

Open
fjrdomingues opened this issue Apr 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

gpt-3.5-turbo behaving differently #119

fjrdomingues opened this issue Apr 23, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@fjrdomingues
Copy link
Owner

Openai must have changed something on the model and now the model "refuses" to answer in JSON.
Also tested on chatgpt, with the same result.
Before it was working almost 100% of the time.

We may be able to solve this by using the "gpt-3.5-turbo-0301" version of the model. Haven't tested it yet.

@fjrdomingues
Copy link
Owner Author

This doesn't seem to be a problem using the new implementation with langchain output format, which is great 👍 Still a warning that model can change, causing unpredictable results. This is why openai launches versions of the models like gpt-3.5-turbo-0301 https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5

@hatkyinc2
Copy link
Collaborator

I've just run a couple of tests on my end I have no issues generating JSON in either chatGPT or playground gpt-3.5-turbo nor the gpt-3.5-turbo-0301

I can see how this could be a problem, generally, any 3rd party agent can change anything we count on at any time, which is one reason I like the local models direction, it's a frozen state.

🤷
Sounds like gpt-3.5-turbo-0301 will be short-lived, but it might be a reminder to generalize the model support more, so it's easy to test. Currently, the biggest hardcoded part is the pricing I think.

@hatkyinc2
Copy link
Collaborator

Please add a unit test to cover this issue if it's still relevant @fjrdomingues
or should we just close this for now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants