You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I have the Factory Simulation 9V and wanted to connect it to the cloud. As I read into the matter a little bit, I discovered that I need the Factory Industry 4.0 to have the cloud functionality. As I analyzed all the programs and how interconnected they are, I discovered that the only thing keeping me from connecting the model to the cloud is the missing camera module, which all the sensor data is sent to through a local MQTT connection, which is then sent to the cloud. My question is: Is there a way I could substitute the local MQTT server with my own? Maybe to trick all the TXT controllers into sending all their data to a different broker adress?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes it possible to run this factory in a local network with the NodeRed dasboard also running on a laptop in this local network.
But you need to make some small changes in the settings.
This is out of the scope of this github entry.
See also the ft-forum and/or contact me by PM.
Yes it possible to run this factory in a local network with the NodeRed dasboard also running on a laptop in this local network. But you need to make some small changes in the settings. This is out of the scope of this github entry. See also the ft-forum and/or contact me by PM.
Thank you, now there is a glimmer of home for me. I have looked through the NodeRed documentation for this before but I still was not able to determine if the TXT with the camera (which is normally the centerpoint of MQTT connection for the whole factory) could be completely omitted with NodeRed.
Hello,
I have the Factory Simulation 9V and wanted to connect it to the cloud. As I read into the matter a little bit, I discovered that I need the Factory Industry 4.0 to have the cloud functionality. As I analyzed all the programs and how interconnected they are, I discovered that the only thing keeping me from connecting the model to the cloud is the missing camera module, which all the sensor data is sent to through a local MQTT connection, which is then sent to the cloud. My question is: Is there a way I could substitute the local MQTT server with my own? Maybe to trick all the TXT controllers into sending all their data to a different broker adress?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: