You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In dark mode (via browser using the style based on OS preference), the page renders with light grey text on a white background, because of the white "DRAFT" watermark image.
This is fixable by disabling the style in web inspector, or running document.body.style.background = '#000' in the page's JavaScript console.
Using the PDF version has black text on a white background (which is actually readable), but has many tables cut off the side of the page (eg: pages 29-31) and other layout and typesetting errors (eg: pages 9-11, 20, 21) which make it unpleasant to read.
PS: I'd put this in the spec's GitHub tracker, but that gives a 404 for being a private repo. I'd be happy to give more detailed feedback about the technical content of the spec (as there are issues), but I can't figure out how to do this without needing to write a rather large cheque to someone. Thanks! 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
micolous
changed the title
HTML FIDO 2.2 draft spec is literally unreadable
HTML FIDO 2.2 draft spec is literally unreadable in dark mode
Apr 14, 2023
URL: https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-v2.2-rd-20230321/fido-client-to-authenticator-protocol-v2.2-rd-20230321.html
In dark mode (via browser using the style based on OS preference), the page renders with light grey text on a white background, because of the white "DRAFT" watermark image.
This is fixable by disabling the style in web inspector, or running
document.body.style.background = '#000'
in the page's JavaScript console.Using the PDF version has black text on a white background (which is actually readable), but has many tables cut off the side of the page (eg: pages 29-31) and other layout and typesetting errors (eg: pages 9-11, 20, 21) which make it unpleasant to read.
PS: I'd put this in the spec's GitHub tracker, but that gives a 404 for being a private repo. I'd be happy to give more detailed feedback about the technical content of the spec (as there are issues), but I can't figure out how to do this without needing to write a rather large cheque to someone. Thanks! 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: