You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's rather annoying to have to sort the DNA and AA sequences for back translation, given that alignment on the AA seqs is likely to lead to reordering. I get that for larger sequence sets, this restriction let's us more efficiently iterate over the data, but I'm doubtful this frequently outweighs the inconvenience of having to reorder sequences yourself. It would be pretty easy to add an optional flag that sorts the sequences for you by seqid (or by dna order or aa order, perhaps also controllable via option).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's rather annoying to have to sort the DNA and AA sequences for back translation, given that alignment on the AA seqs is likely to lead to reordering. I get that for larger sequence sets, this restriction let's us more efficiently iterate over the data, but I'm doubtful this frequently outweighs the inconvenience of having to reorder sequences yourself. It would be pretty easy to add an optional flag that sorts the sequences for you by seqid (or by dna order or aa order, perhaps also controllable via option).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: