Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

integrate proDA #25

Open
wolski opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

integrate proDA #25

wolski opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@wolski

Comments

@wolski
Copy link
Collaborator

wolski commented Oct 1, 2021

Add proDA as a further modeling option in prolfqua.
@wolski wolski self-assigned this Oct 1, 2021
@wolski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wolski commented Nov 11, 2021

In proDA you specify the contrasts differently than in prolfqua, But I think I can work around it using
run_wald_parameter_test (currently private function).
seems that the second argument it takes is:

                 (Intercept) Treatmentplacebo
Treatment16mg              1                0
Treatmentplacebo           1                1
16mgvsPlacebo              0               -1

@wolski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wolski commented Dec 23, 2023

It seems that proDA now has a contrast interface similar to that of prolfqua
https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/proDA/inst/doc/Introduction.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wolski wolski

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wolski