You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DNF5 is now the default package manager in Fedora 41, so presumably RHEL 11 will follow suit and therefore so should ELN. In order to do so, the following step must be taken:
%dnf5_obsoletes_dnf needs to be true for RHEL 11 in both dnf.spec and dnf5.spec simultaneously, meaning switching 0%{?rhel} > 11 to 0%{?rhel} > 10 in coordinated releases of both packages in tandem.
At the same time, presumably dnf-4, libdnf, etc. will see less maintenance, and therefore should also be dropped. However, getting rid of those will take more work, mostly beyond our scope:
What does the ELN SIG need to do?
DNF5 is now the default package manager in Fedora 41, so presumably RHEL 11 will follow suit and therefore so should ELN. In order to do so, the following step must be taken:
%dnf5_obsoletes_dnf
needs to be true for RHEL 11 in both dnf.spec and dnf5.spec simultaneously, meaning switching0%{?rhel} > 11
to0%{?rhel} > 10
in coordinated releases of both packages in tandem.At the same time, presumably dnf-4, libdnf, etc. will see less maintenance, and therefore should also be dropped. However, getting rid of those will take more work, mostly beyond our scope:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: