[FEAT] Forcing IPv6 in output by default

[Disinterpreter]

Wanted features:

At the moment, doing a fastfetch command i've get only my IPv4 address with a subnet.
I think it is little wrong, IPv6 must be preferred as in all services.
So I suggest to change network output:
IPv6 GUA on interface (if it exist 2000::/3)
IPv6 ULA on interface (if it exist fc00::/7)
and after that IPv4 address.

and making a flag for link-local(fe80::/10) like --localip-show-link-local

Motivation:

IPv4 actual protocol, but it gonna be old in future, we should force IPv6 output everywhere for next generation of engineers.

[CarterLi]

IPv6 GUA on interface (if it exist 2000::/3)
IPv6 ULA on interface (if it exist fc00::/8)

Doesn't it leak your public ip address?

[Disinterpreter]

IPv6 GUA on interface (if it exist 2000::/3)
IPv6 ULA on interface (if it exist fc00::/8)

Doesn't it leak your public ip address?

1. Is it really somebody cares, especially if we show address by rfc8981
2. "Leaking" isn't security issue, it's just an address.
3. If i launch fastfetch now at my server, it shows me my "white" ipv4 address. Same thing.

I really read FAQ and as network engineer, I truly don't understand the problem of "leaking" IP. But if people want to hide their IP, we could make a flag which hide IP or replace some octets/hextets to :XXXX: / .xxx.

[CarterLi]

Many people hate that

If you want to show IPv6, you can set the config

{
    "type": "localip",
    "showAllIps": true,
    "showIpv6": true,
    "format": "{ipv6} [v6] {ipv4} [v4]"
}

Sorting is not supported though.

[Disinterpreter]

Many people hate that

If you want to show IPv6, you can set the config

{
"type": "localip",
"showAllIps": true,
"showIpv6": true,
"format": "{ipv6} [v6] {ipv4} [v4]"
}

Sorting is not supported though.

OFFTOPIC!

If somebody trying to hack by its IP it isn't problem of fastfetch, it is OS/Software problem, and it will happen anyway, with fastfetch or not. Moreover you are the maintainer of this repo, and if you want to show IP, who cares? Showing IPv6 really safe, like with IPv4. And IPv6 anyway will change if it be given by RA.

"It should not require secrecy, and it should not be a problem if it falls into enemy hands;" you know...

Anyway I think it's better to consider to devide pools of addresses by ULA, GUA, link-locals, because in IPv6 having few addresses on the interface is a normal thing.