-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish to NPM #64
Comments
@jgaehring made the point that we might need to rename from |
The main benefits I can come up with at the moment are that it would make the library:
So I guess the first question is, do we want to prioritize discovery of this library? My sense at this time is that, no, that is not a priority. This library would be useful to other developers I think only at the point that they are consuming other libraries first, like farmOS.js etc, and potentially |
😱 |
Our Sci is considering using the library in their PWA and potentially in their Quick Carbon app. The latter does not have any direct connection to farmOS. Just to say that there are some potential use-cases developing... but they can also just do what farmOS-client is doing in |
Oh interesting, not sure I realized that. I guess I'm wondering whether we want to capture third-party developers who might not otherwise be aware it was an option. Folks we're not already working with, or might not ever have a close connection to. |
Bumping up the priority of this. We need to be able to pull farmOS-map from NPM (or Bower) in order to include it in farmOS 2.x via Composer. These needs are described in: https://www.drupal.org/project/farm/issues/3186641 |
Done! https://www.npmjs.com/package/@farmos.org/farmos-map And available on asset-packagist.org: https://asset-packagist.org/package/detail?fullname=npm-asset/farmos.org--farmos-map Encountered an issue in the process, and implemented a workaround, which I documented here: #99 |
Should we publish farmOS-map to NPM?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: