Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

W: Signature by key uses weak digest algorithm #6

Open
jonchampagne opened this issue Apr 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

W: Signature by key uses weak digest algorithm #6

jonchampagne opened this issue Apr 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jonchampagne
Copy link

Using Ubuntu 16.04.2, the following warning appears when running apt-get update

W: http://repo.factoriommo.org/dists/jessie/InRelease: Signature by key F38CADB4EE370FEBB715B6DCBADE6B59FEDBCF3A uses weak digest algorithm (SHA1)

It's not a big deal, the repo still works fine, but it's not guaranteed to work in the future, so this is probably something that should be fixed sooner rather than later.

@maikelwever
Copy link
Contributor

I'm currently looking into having the repository on free hosted services, instead of my private GitLab server and buggy webhook. Then I will also tackle this.

Do you happen to know if we can improve the current key, or need to create an entirely new one, and if we need to create a new one, how can we migrate existing users to this new key?

@jonchampagne
Copy link
Author

Personally I have no idea of the key could simply be improved or not. I just figured I'd bring the warning to your attention as something to eventually fix.

@psihius
Copy link
Member

psihius commented Jul 27, 2017

@maikelwever I suggest we have a talk and maybe use our fmmo server to host all the stuff, or have a small DO instance for that (thankfully those are cheap).

@maikelwever
Copy link
Contributor

@psihius that won't necessarily solve this. I'd rather migrate to travisci+bintray so it can be managed by more than one person.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants