You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just had two questions about Robyn, and wasn't sure where to post them. Hopefully this is the right place.
Is there a way to get the decomposition over time plot like that from lightweight mmm:
Is it fair to compare the adstock parameter theta from Robyn with lightweight mmm's 'lag_weight' for a geometric adstock model? The reason I am asking is because I am getting very different values from the two packages. It's true that one is for spends (Robyn) and the other, for impressions/clicks (lightweight MMM), but it's still strange just how different they are. Both packages produce seemingly great fits btw.
Thank you for your help!
Natalia
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Natalia
1. Check pareto_alldecomp_matrix.csv
2. Best to post such questions in the Facebook community group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/robynmmm to get opinions from the community
esp. when comparing with other packages
Another idea would to generate simulated data - for example using
siMMMulator - https://github.com/facebookexperimental/siMMMulator and
compare the results when you know the ground truth value of parameters?
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:18 PM Natalia Connolly ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Team,
I just had two questions about Robyn, and wasn't sure where to post them.
Hopefully this is the right place.
1. Is there a way to get the decomposition over time plot like that
from lightweight mmm:
Screenshot.2024-06-23.at.6.12.26.PM.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/facebookexperimental/Robyn/assets/25134879/da145c30-6f24-4f19-8750-4f1cb665d167>
2.
Is it fair to compare the adstock parameter theta from Robyn with
lightweight mmm's 'lag_weight' for a geometric adstock model? The reason I
am asking is because I am getting very different values from the two
packages. It's true that one is for spends (Robyn) and the other, for
impressions/clicks (lightweight MMM), but it's still strange just how
different they are. Both packages produce seemingly great fits btw.
Thank you for your help!
Natalia
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1007>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARF52KGMGWYIQGZYHCJK2BDZI5CTTAVCNFSM6AAAAABJYXLO26VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGM3DQOJRGM2TENI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Hi Team,
I just had two questions about Robyn, and wasn't sure where to post them. Hopefully this is the right place.
Is it fair to compare the adstock parameter theta from Robyn with lightweight mmm's 'lag_weight' for a geometric adstock model? The reason I am asking is because I am getting very different values from the two packages. It's true that one is for spends (Robyn) and the other, for impressions/clicks (lightweight MMM), but it's still strange just how different they are. Both packages produce seemingly great fits btw.
Thank you for your help!
Natalia
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: