-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support to OpenJDK 17? #70
Comments
@aldoborrero: Using Quarkus, I'd love to have a OpenJDK 17 version too. For experimental purposes, I cloned the repo and did an ubi 8.4 / OpenJDK 17 image myself, but presumably there is some more work to do:
|
Hi @mzellho thanks for sharing! I forget to mention that I forked the repository and added preliminary support to Centos8 / JDK17. Unfortunately Centos8 will finish support on December (which is now). Maybe we can integrate your work on ubi in that repository as well. |
@aldoborrero Oh, that is good news! I've got the feeling that it would be a good idea to go to ubi 8.5 as well (as the OpenJDK package seems like it's meant to be used in an 8.5 context, too). I have not made any tests here, just few very tiny steps, and unfortunately there is not too much time for more testing. But if you think that it would be a good add-on to your repository already, I'll happily contribute. |
@mzellho feel free to take a look to the repository as I added support to UBI 8.5 and also to Alpine and Ubuntu 20.04. Would you mind to test it? I'll do my part on Ubuntu as I need that particular image for what I'm currently working on. As this is still a much WIP I haven't uploaded any of the images to Docker Hub. |
Is it possible to add support to OpenJDK 17 LTS?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: