`use` in top-level expression results in invalid Python syntax

[joprice]

Description

When useing an IDisposable at the top-level, the generated code contains a return statement, which is not valid outside of the context of a function definition.

Repro code

https://fable.io/repl/#?code=PYBwpgdgBAYghgIwDZgHQGFgCcwChcAuAnuFABpQC8UAlhABZhY0FQDKRAzgWALaoBJACI1OIYJ0Qp8AbQA8AcSTAEcJAD4AurhSsAHgC5yVKBDgEaANzAB5CEiL5dUABQBKE7ihQArpzBQeiZ6Xq5uQA&html=Q&css=Q

Expected and actual results

The expression should be wrapped in something like an IIFE, as is the case for the js backend.

Related information

• Fable version: 4.19.3
• Operating system: OSX

[MangelMaxime]

I didn't even know it was a valid F# syntax to have a function without a name 😅

[joprice]

It's not actually a function, but an assignment of a top-level expression to unit, a habit I picked up from ocaml that is similar to x |> ignore<unit>, where if the result type changes, the unused value will be detected. You can reproduce it like this as well:

(
  use x = x
  ()
)

Or

let _ =
  use x = x
  ()

[dbrattli]

Thanks for opening this issue. I've added a fix that I think handle the problem correctly. Please reopen if you still experience problems related to this issue. The fix will tranlate the code to:

class X(IDisposable):
    pass

with x as x:
    pass