Can't compile due to error implicit declaration of function #7
Comments
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2025
commit 28936b62e71e41600bab319f262ea9f9b1027629 upstream.
inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes
write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118:
inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0
__inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689
(inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4]
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4]
ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4]
_ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4]
__block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
__block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4]
generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
__vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
vfs_write+0x103/0x260
ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
__x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65:
ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4]
ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815
ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4]
ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4]
ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4]
ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4]
ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4]
process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90
worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0
kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8:
#0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90
xxmustafacooTR#1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90
xxmustafacooTR#2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
xxmustafacooTR#3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4]
irq event stamp: 3009267
hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ exynos-linux-stable#7
Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4]
The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which
results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2025
[ Upstream commit 76e7527 ] Some servers seem to accept connections while booting but never send the SMBNegotiate response neither close the connection, causing all processes accessing the share hang on uninterruptible sleep state. This happens when the cifs_demultiplex_thread detects the server is unresponsive so releases the socket and start trying to reconnect. At some point, the faulty server will accept the socket and the TCP status will be set to NeedNegotiate. The first issued command accessing the share will start the negotiation (pid 5828 below), but the response will never arrive so other commands will be blocked waiting on the mutex (pid 55352). This patch checks for unresponsive servers also on the negotiate stage releasing the socket and reconnecting if the response is not received and checking again the tcp state when the mutex is acquired. PID: 55352 TASK: ffff880fd6cc02c0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "ls" #0 [ffff880fd9add9f0] schedule at ffffffff81467eb9 xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffff880fd9addb38] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffff81468fe0 xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffff880fd9addba8] mutex_lock at ffffffff81468b1a xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffff880fd9addbc0] cifs_reconnect_tcon at ffffffffa042f905 [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffff880fd9addc60] smb_init at ffffffffa042faeb [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffff880fd9addca0] CIFSSMBQPathInfo at ffffffffa04360b5 [cifs] .... Which is waiting a mutex owned by: PID: 5828 TASK: ffff880fcc55e400 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "xxxx" #0 [ffff880fbfdc19b8] schedule at ffffffff81467eb9 xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffff880fbfdc1b00] wait_for_response at ffffffffa044f96d [cifs] xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffff880fbfdc1b60] SendReceive at ffffffffa04505ce [cifs] xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffff880fbfdc1bb0] CIFSSMBNegotiate at ffffffffa0438d79 [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffff880fbfdc1c50] cifs_negotiate_protocol at ffffffffa043b383 [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffff880fbfdc1c80] cifs_reconnect_tcon at ffffffffa042f911 [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffff880fbfdc1d20] smb_init at ffffffffa042faeb [cifs] exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffff880fbfdc1d60] CIFSSMBQFSInfo at ffffffffa0434eb0 [cifs] .... Signed-off-by: Samuel Cabrero <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Aurélien Aptel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2025
[ Upstream commit ec9c7d1 ] Exercising CPU hotplug on a 5.2 kernel with recent padata fixes from cryptodev-2.6.git in an 8-CPU kvm guest... # modprobe tcrypt alg="pcrypt(rfc4106(gcm(aes)))" type=3 # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online # echo c > /sys/kernel/pcrypt/pencrypt/parallel_cpumask # modprobe tcrypt mode=215 ...caused the following crash: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [xxmustafacooTR#1] SMP PTI CPU: 2 PID: 134 Comm: kworker/2:2 Not tainted 5.2.0-padata-base+ exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-<snip> Workqueue: pencrypt padata_parallel_worker RIP: 0010:padata_reorder+0xcb/0x180 ... Call Trace: padata_do_serial+0x57/0x60 pcrypt_aead_enc+0x3a/0x50 [pcrypt] padata_parallel_worker+0x9b/0xe0 process_one_work+0x1b5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4a/0x3c0 ... In padata_alloc_pd, pd->cpu is set using the user-supplied cpumask instead of the effective cpumask, and in this case cpumask_first picked an offline CPU. The offline CPU's reorder->list.next is NULL in padata_reorder because the list wasn't initialized in padata_init_pqueues, which only operates on CPUs in the effective mask. Fix by using the effective mask in padata_alloc_pd. Fixes: 6fc4dbc ("padata: Replace delayed timer with immediate workqueue in padata_reorder") Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]> Cc: Herbert Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
[ Upstream commit e24c6447ccb7b1a01f9bf0aec94939e6450c0b4d ]
I compiled with AddressSanitizer and I had these memory leaks while I
was using the tep_parse_format function:
Direct leak of 28 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fb07db49ffe in __interceptor_realloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dffe)
xxmustafacooTR#1 0x7fb07a724228 in extend_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:985
xxmustafacooTR#2 0x7fb07a724c21 in __read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1140
xxmustafacooTR#3 0x7fb07a724f78 in read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1206
exynos-linux-stable#4 0x7fb07a725191 in __read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1291
exynos-linux-stable#5 0x7fb07a7251df in read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1299
exynos-linux-stable#6 0x7fb07a72e6c8 in process_dynamic_array_len /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:2849
exynos-linux-stable#7 0x7fb07a7304b8 in process_function /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3161
#8 0x7fb07a730900 in process_arg_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3207
#9 0x7fb07a727c0b in process_arg /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1786
#10 0x7fb07a731080 in event_read_print_args /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3285
#11 0x7fb07a731722 in event_read_print /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3369
#12 0x7fb07a740054 in __tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6335
#13 0x7fb07a74047a in __parse_event /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6389
#14 0x7fb07a740536 in tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6431
#15 0x7fb07a785acf in parse_event ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:251
#16 0x7fb07a785ccd in parse_systems ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:284
#17 0x7fb07a786fb3 in read_metadata ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:593
#18 0x7fb07a78760e in ftrace_fs_source_init ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:727
#19 0x7fb07d90c19c in add_component_with_init_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1048
#20 0x7fb07d90c87b in add_source_component_with_initialize_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1127
#21 0x7fb07d90c92a in bt_graph_add_source_component ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1152
#22 0x55db11aa632e in cmd_run_ctx_create_components_from_config_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2252
#23 0x55db11aa6fda in cmd_run_ctx_create_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2347
#24 0x55db11aa780c in cmd_run ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2461
#25 0x55db11aa8a7d in main ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2673
#26 0x7fb07d5460b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)
The token variable in the process_dynamic_array_len function is
allocated in the read_expect_type function, but is not freed before
calling the read_token function.
Free the token variable before calling read_token in order to plug the
leak.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
[ Upstream commit d26383dcb2b4b8629fde05270b4e3633be9e3d4b ]
The following leaks were detected by ASAN:
Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
xxmustafacooTR#1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
xxmustafacooTR#2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
xxmustafacooTR#3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
exynos-linux-stable#4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
exynos-linux-stable#5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
exynos-linux-stable#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
exynos-linux-stable#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result xxmustafacooTR#1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result xxmustafacooTR#2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result xxmustafacooTR#3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result exynos-linux-stable#4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result exynos-linux-stable#5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result exynos-linux-stable#6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result exynos-linux-stable#7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2025
[ Upstream commit 4a9d81caf841cd2c0ae36abec9c2963bf21d0284 ] If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration process will fall into an endless loop. kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137] PID: 17137 TASK: ffff8818d93c0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "nfsd" [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76] RIP: ffffffffc00e817c RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff881dc0c38298 RBX: ffffffff81b03580 RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50 RDX: ffff881e3fce8500 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81b03580 RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0 R8: 0000000000000020 R9: ffff8818d3aefd40 R10: ffff88017fc03800 R11: ffff8818e83933c0 R12: ffff8818d3aefd40 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8818e8391068 R15: ffff8818fa6e4000 CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace] xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd] xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd] xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd] exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd] exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc] exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc] exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd] #8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607 The troublemake elem: crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298 struct lock_manager { list = { next = 0xffff881dc0c38298, prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298 }, block_opens = false } Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2025
[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ]
The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw
data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the
array after it.
The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have
an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data.
27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4:
runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type
'__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here
00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
^
#0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13
xxmustafacooTR#1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8
xxmustafacooTR#2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9
xxmustafacooTR#3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9
exynos-linux-stable#4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9
exynos-linux-stable#5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4
exynos-linux-stable#6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9
exynos-linux-stable#7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11
#8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8
#9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2
#10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3
#11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc)
#12 0x561532596828 in _start ...
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use
util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in
Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2025
[ Upstream commit e8bd76ede155fd54d8c41d045dda43cd3174d506 ] kernel panic trace looks like: exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffffb9e08698fc80] do_page_fault at ffffffffb666e0d7 exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffffb9e08698fcb0] page_fault at ffffffffb70010fe [exception RIP: amp_read_loc_assoc_final_data+63] RIP: ffffffffc06ab54f RSP: ffffb9e08698fd68 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c8845a5a000 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8c8b9153d000 RDI: ffff8c8845a5a000 RBP: ffffb9e08698fe40 R8: 00000000000330e0 R9: ffffffffc0675c94 R10: ffffb9e08698fe58 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8c8b9cbf6200 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8c8b2026da0b ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffffb9e08698fda8] hci_event_packet at ffffffffc0676904 [bluetooth] #8 [ffffb9e08698fe50] hci_rx_work at ffffffffc06629ac [bluetooth] #9 [ffffb9e08698fe98] process_one_work at ffffffffb66f95e7 hcon->amp_mgr seems NULL triggered kernel panic in following line inside function amp_read_loc_assoc_final_data set_bit(READ_LOC_AMP_ASSOC_FINAL, &mgr->state); Fixed by checking NULL for mgr. Signed-off-by: Gopal Tiwari <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2025
commit 90bd070aae6c4fb5d302f9c4b9c88be60c8197ec upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc xxmustafacooTR#1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 xxmustafacooTR#2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 xxmustafacooTR#3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] exynos-linux-stable#4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 exynos-linux-stable#5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 exynos-linux-stable#6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 exynos-linux-stable#7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc xxmustafacooTR#1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 xxmustafacooTR#2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 xxmustafacooTR#3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 exynos-linux-stable#4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d exynos-linux-stable#5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] exynos-linux-stable#6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] exynos-linux-stable#7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2025
commit 2800aadc18a64c96b051bcb7da8a7df7d505db3f upstream. It's possible for iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() to be called with hard IRQs disabled (e.g. from LED core). We can't enable BHs in such a situation. Turn the unconditional BH-enable/BH-disable code into hardirq-disable/conditional-enable. This fixes the warning below. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1139 at kernel/softirq.c:178 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 CPU: 1 PID: 1139 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-00004-gb4ded168af79 exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: LENOVO 20K5S22R00/20K5S22R00, BIOS R0IET38W (1.16 ) 05/31/2017 RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0 Code: f7 69 e8 ee 23 14 00 fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 8b 05 f0 f4 f7 69 85 c0 74 3f 48 83 c4 08 5b c3 65 8b 05 9b fe f7 69 85 c0 75 8e <0f> 0b eb 8a 48 89 3c 24 e8 4e 20 14 00 48 8b 3c 24 eb 91 e8 13 4e RSP: 0018:ffffafd580b13298 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000201 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000201 RDI: ffffffffc1272389 RBP: ffff96517ae4c018 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffafd580b13178 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff96517b060000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff80000000 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007fc604ebefc0(0000) GS:ffff965267480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055fb3fef13b2 CR3: 0000000109112004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 Call Trace: ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x1f/0x30 iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd+0x5d9/0xa00 [iwlwifi] iwl_trans_txq_send_hcmd+0x6c/0x430 [iwlwifi] iwl_trans_send_cmd+0x88/0x170 [iwlwifi] ? lock_acquire+0x277/0x3d0 iwl_mvm_send_cmd+0x32/0x80 [iwlmvm] iwl_mvm_led_set+0xc2/0xe0 [iwlmvm] ? led_trigger_event+0x46/0x70 led_trigger_event+0x46/0x70 ieee80211_do_open+0x5c5/0xa20 [mac80211] ieee80211_open+0x67/0x90 [mac80211] __dev_open+0xd4/0x150 __dev_change_flags+0x19e/0x1f0 dev_change_flags+0x23/0x60 do_setlink+0x30d/0x1230 ? lock_is_held_type+0xb4/0x120 ? __nla_validate_parse.part.7+0x57/0xcb0 ? __lock_acquire+0x2e1/0x1a50 __rtnl_newlink+0x560/0x910 ? __lock_acquire+0x2e1/0x1a50 ? __lock_acquire+0x2e1/0x1a50 ? lock_acquire+0x277/0x3d0 ? sock_def_readable+0x5/0x290 ? lock_is_held_type+0xb4/0x120 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 ? sock_def_readable+0xb3/0x290 ? lock_release+0x166/0x2a0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x90/0x120 rtnl_newlink+0x47/0x70 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x25c/0x470 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x97/0x3e0 ? validate_linkmsg+0x350/0x350 netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x1b2/0x280 netlink_sendmsg+0x336/0x450 sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 ____sys_sendmsg+0x1ed/0x250 ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x90 ___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xb4/0x120 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 ? lock_release+0x166/0x2a0 ? __fget_files+0xfe/0x1d0 ? __sys_sendmsg+0x5e/0xa0 __sys_sendmsg+0x5e/0xa0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd9/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc605c9572d Code: 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 da ee ff ff 8b 54 24 1c 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 33 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 2e ef ff ff 48 RSP: 002b:00007fffc83789f0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055ef468570c0 RCX: 00007fc605c9572d RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007fffc8378a30 RDI: 000000000000000c RBP: 0000000000000010 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fffc8378b80 R14: 00007fffc8378b7c R15: 0000000000000000 irq event stamp: 170785 hardirqs last enabled at (170783): [<ffffffff9609a8c2>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xf0 hardirqs last disabled at (170784): [<ffffffff96a8613d>] _raw_read_lock_irqsave+0x8d/0x90 softirqs last enabled at (170782): [<ffffffffc1272389>] iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd+0x5d9/0xa00 [iwlwifi] softirqs last disabled at (170785): [<ffffffffc1271ec6>] iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd+0x116/0xa00 [iwlwifi] Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> # LLVM/Clang v12.0.0-rc3 Acked-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jari Ruusu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2025
[ Upstream commit f63d24baff787e13b723d86fe036f84bdbc35045 ]
This fixes the following trace caused by receiving
HCI_EV_DISCONN_PHY_LINK_COMPLETE which does call hci_conn_del without
first checking if conn->type is in fact AMP_LINK and in case it is
do properly cleanup upper layers with hci_disconn_cfm:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in hci_send_acl+0xaba/0xc50
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800e404818 by task bluetoothd/142
CPU: 0 PID: 142 Comm: bluetoothd Not tainted
5.17.0-rc5-00006-gda4022eeac1a exynos-linux-stable#7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x150
kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b
hci_send_acl+0xaba/0xc50
l2cap_do_send+0x23f/0x3d0
l2cap_chan_send+0xc06/0x2cc0
l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x201/0x2b0
sock_sendmsg+0xdc/0x110
sock_write_iter+0x20f/0x370
do_iter_readv_writev+0x343/0x690
do_iter_write+0x132/0x640
vfs_writev+0x198/0x570
do_writev+0x202/0x280
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RSP: 002b:00007ffce8a099b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014
Code: 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3
0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 14 00 00 00 0f 05
<48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007ffce8a099e0 RDI: 0000000000000015
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffce8a099e0 RCX: 00007f788fc3cf77
R10: 00007ffce8af7080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e4ccf75580
RBP: 0000000000000015 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000001
</TASK>
R13: 000055e4ccf754a0 R14: 000055e4ccf75cd0 R15: 000055e4ccf4a6b0
Allocated by task 45:
kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
__kasan_kmalloc+0x81/0xa0
hci_chan_create+0x9a/0x2f0
l2cap_conn_add.part.0+0x1a/0xdc0
l2cap_connect_cfm+0x236/0x1000
le_conn_complete_evt+0x15a7/0x1db0
hci_le_conn_complete_evt+0x226/0x2c0
hci_le_meta_evt+0x247/0x450
hci_event_packet+0x61b/0xe90
hci_rx_work+0x4d5/0xc50
process_one_work+0x8fb/0x15a0
worker_thread+0x576/0x1240
kthread+0x29d/0x340
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Freed by task 45:
kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30
__kasan_slab_free+0xfb/0x130
kfree+0xac/0x350
hci_conn_cleanup+0x101/0x6a0
hci_conn_del+0x27e/0x6c0
hci_disconn_phylink_complete_evt+0xe0/0x120
hci_event_packet+0x812/0xe90
hci_rx_work+0x4d5/0xc50
process_one_work+0x8fb/0x15a0
worker_thread+0x576/0x1240
kthread+0x29d/0x340
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800c0f0500
The buggy address is located 24 bytes inside of
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128
The buggy address belongs to the page:
128-byte region [ffff88800c0f0500, ffff88800c0f0580)
flags: 0x100000000000200(slab|node=0|zone=1)
page:00000000fe45cd86 refcount:1 mapcount:0
mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0xc0f0
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff
0000000000000000
raw: 0100000000000200 ffffea00003a2c80 dead000000000004
ffff8880078418c0
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
ffff88800c0f0400: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc
Memory state around the buggy address:
>ffff88800c0f0500: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff88800c0f0480: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
ffff88800c0f0580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
^
==================================================================
ffff88800c0f0600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
Reported-by: Sönke Huster <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Sönke Huster <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2025
[ Upstream commit af68656d66eda219b7f55ce8313a1da0312c79e1 ]
While handling PCI errors (AER flow) driver tries to
disable NAPI [napi_disable()] after NAPI is deleted
[__netif_napi_del()] which causes unexpected system
hang/crash.
System message log shows the following:
=======================================
[ 3222.537510] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on PHB#384-PE#800000 [ 3222.537511] EEH: This PCI device has failed 2 times in the last hour and will be permanently disabled after 5 failures.
[ 3222.537512] EEH: Notify device drivers to shutdown [ 3222.537513] EEH: Beginning: 'error_detected(IO frozen)'
[ 3222.537514] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking
bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen)
[ 3222.537516] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth14)]IO error detected [ 3222.537650] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): bnx2x driver reports:
'need reset'
[ 3222.537651] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): Invoking
bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen)
[ 3222.537651] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth13)]IO error detected [ 3222.537729] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): bnx2x driver reports:
'need reset'
[ 3222.537729] EEH: Finished:'error_detected(IO frozen)' with aggregate recovery state:'need reset'
[ 3222.537890] EEH: Collect temporary log [ 3222.583481] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.0 [ 3222.583519] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow:
[ 3222.583744] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da2 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.583892] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows:
[ 3222.584079] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.584230] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.584378] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.1 [ 3222.584454] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.584491] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.584492] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow:
[ 3222.584677] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da2 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.584825] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows:
[ 3222.585011] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.585160] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.585309] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.585347] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.586872] RTAS: event: 5, Type: Platform Error (224), Severity: 2 [ 3222.586873] EEH: Reset without hotplug activity [ 3224.762767] EEH: Beginning: 'slot_reset'
[ 3224.762770] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking
bnx2x->slot_reset()
[ 3224.762771] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14271(eth14)]IO slot reset initializing...
[ 3224.762887] bnx2x 0384:80:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) [ 3224.768157] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14287(eth14)]IO slot reset
--> driver unload
Uninterruptible tasks
=====================
crash> ps | grep UN
213 2 11 c000000004c89e00 UN 0.0 0 0 [eehd]
215 2 0 c000000004c80000 UN 0.0 0 0
[kworker/0:2]
2196 1 28 c000000004504f00 UN 0.1 15936 11136 wickedd
4287 1 9 c00000020d076800 UN 0.0 4032 3008 agetty
4289 1 20 c00000020d056680 UN 0.0 7232 3840 agetty
32423 2 26 c00000020038c580 UN 0.0 0 0
[kworker/26:3]
32871 4241 27 c0000002609ddd00 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd
32920 10130 16 c00000027284a100 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail
33092 32987 0 c000000205218b00 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail
33154 4567 16 c000000260e51780 UN 0.1 48832 12864 pickup
33209 4241 36 c000000270cb6500 UN 0.1 18624 11712 sshd
33473 33283 0 c000000205211480 UN 0.1 48512 12672 sendmail
33531 4241 37 c00000023c902780 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd
EEH handler hung while bnx2x sleeping and holding RTNL lock
===========================================================
crash> bt 213
PID: 213 TASK: c000000004c89e00 CPU: 11 COMMAND: "eehd"
#0 [c000000004d477e0] __schedule at c000000000c70808
xxmustafacooTR#1 [c000000004d478b0] schedule at c000000000c70ee0
xxmustafacooTR#2 [c000000004d478e0] schedule_timeout at c000000000c76dec
xxmustafacooTR#3 [c000000004d479c0] msleep at c0000000002120cc
exynos-linux-stable#4 [c000000004d479f0] napi_disable at c000000000a06448
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
exynos-linux-stable#5 [c000000004d47a30] bnx2x_netif_stop at c0080000018dba94 [bnx2x]
exynos-linux-stable#6 [c000000004d47a60] bnx2x_io_slot_reset at c0080000018a551c [bnx2x]
exynos-linux-stable#7 [c000000004d47b20] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004c9bc
#8 [c000000004d47b90] eeh_pe_report at c00000000004d1a8
#9 [c000000004d47c40] eeh_handle_normal_event at c00000000004da64
And the sleeping source code
============================
crash> dis -ls c000000000a06448
FILE: ../net/core/dev.c
LINE: 6702
6697 {
6698 might_sleep();
6699 set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
6700
6701 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
* 6702 msleep(1);
6703 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state))
6704 msleep(1);
6705
6706 hrtimer_cancel(&n->timer);
6707
6708 clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
6709 }
EEH calls into bnx2x twice based on the system log above, first through
bnx2x_io_error_detected() and then bnx2x_io_slot_reset(), and executes
the following call chains:
bnx2x_io_error_detected()
+-> bnx2x_eeh_nic_unload()
+-> bnx2x_del_all_napi()
+-> __netif_napi_del()
bnx2x_io_slot_reset()
+-> bnx2x_netif_stop()
+-> bnx2x_napi_disable()
+->napi_disable()
Fix this by correcting the sequence of NAPI APIs usage,
that is delete the NAPI after disabling it.
Fixes: 7fa6f34 ("bnx2x: AER revised")
Reported-by: David Christensen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: David Christensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
commit 38c9c22a85aeed28d0831f230136e9cf6fa2ed44 upstream. Syzkaller reported use-after-free bug as follows: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880751acee8 by task a.out/879 CPU: 7 PID: 879 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-next-20220630-00001-gcc5218c8bd2c-dirty exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x1c0/0x2b0 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0xd4/0x484 print_report.cold+0x55/0x232 kasan_report+0xbf/0xf0 ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 ntfs_are_names_equal.cold+0x2b/0x41 ntfs_attr_find+0x43b/0xb90 ntfs_attr_lookup+0x16d/0x1e0 ntfs_read_locked_attr_inode+0x4aa/0x2360 ntfs_attr_iget+0x1af/0x220 ntfs_read_locked_inode+0x246c/0x5120 ntfs_iget+0x132/0x180 load_system_files+0x1cc6/0x3480 ntfs_fill_super+0xa66/0x1cf0 mount_bdev+0x38d/0x460 legacy_get_tree+0x10d/0x220 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x300 do_new_mount+0x2da/0x6d0 path_mount+0x496/0x19d0 __x64_sys_mount+0x284/0x300 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7f3f2118d9ea Code: 48 8b 0d a9 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 76 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc269deac8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f3f2118d9ea RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007ffc269dec00 RBP: 00007ffc269dec80 R08: 00007ffc269deb00 R09: 00007ffc269dec44 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000055f81ab1d220 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:0000000085430378 refcount:1 mapcount:1 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x555c6a81d pfn:0x751ac memcg:ffff888101f7e180 anon flags: 0xfffffc00a0014(uptodate|lru|mappedtodisk|swapbacked|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 000fffffc00a0014 ffffea0001bf2988 ffffea0001de2448 ffff88801712e201 raw: 0000000555c6a81d 0000000000000000 0000000100000000 ffff888101f7e180 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8880751acd80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751ace00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff8880751ace80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ ffff8880751acf00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751acf80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ================================================================== The reason is that struct ATTR_RECORD->name_offset is 6485, end address of name string is out of bounds. Fix this by adding sanity check on end address of attribute name string. [[email protected]: coding-style cleanups] [[email protected]: cleanup suggested by Hawkins Jiawei] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]> Cc: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Cc: Yongqiang Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Yi <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Xiaoxu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
…loc() commit d29f59051d3a07b81281b2df2b8c9dfe4716067f upstream. The voice allocator sometimes begins allocating from near the end of the array and then wraps around, however snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc() accesses the newly allocated voices as if it never wrapped around. This results in out of bounds access if the first voice has a high enough index so that first_voice + requested_voice_count > NUM_G (64). The more voices are requested, the more likely it is for this to occur. This was initially discovered using PipeWire, however it can be reproduced by calling aplay multiple times with 16 channels: aplay -r 48000 -D plughw:CARD=Live,DEV=3 -c 16 /dev/zero UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c:127:40 index 65 is out of range for type 'snd_emu10k1_voice [64]' CPU: 1 PID: 31977 Comm: aplay Tainted: G W IOE 6.0.0-rc2-emu10k1+ exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC P5W DH Deluxe/P5W DH Deluxe, BIOS 3002 07/22/2010 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x3f __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x44/0x49 snd_emu10k1_playback_hw_params+0x3bc/0x420 [snd_emu10k1] snd_pcm_hw_params+0x29f/0x600 [snd_pcm] snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x188/0x1410 [snd_pcm] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x27/0x40 [snd_pcm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Signed-off-by: Tasos Sahanidis <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] #8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 #9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 #10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 #11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 #12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde #13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b #14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 #15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a #16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 #17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca #18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
commit 38c9c22a85aeed28d0831f230136e9cf6fa2ed44 upstream. Syzkaller reported use-after-free bug as follows: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880751acee8 by task a.out/879 CPU: 7 PID: 879 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-next-20220630-00001-gcc5218c8bd2c-dirty exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x1c0/0x2b0 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0xd4/0x484 print_report.cold+0x55/0x232 kasan_report+0xbf/0xf0 ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 ntfs_are_names_equal.cold+0x2b/0x41 ntfs_attr_find+0x43b/0xb90 ntfs_attr_lookup+0x16d/0x1e0 ntfs_read_locked_attr_inode+0x4aa/0x2360 ntfs_attr_iget+0x1af/0x220 ntfs_read_locked_inode+0x246c/0x5120 ntfs_iget+0x132/0x180 load_system_files+0x1cc6/0x3480 ntfs_fill_super+0xa66/0x1cf0 mount_bdev+0x38d/0x460 legacy_get_tree+0x10d/0x220 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x300 do_new_mount+0x2da/0x6d0 path_mount+0x496/0x19d0 __x64_sys_mount+0x284/0x300 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7f3f2118d9ea Code: 48 8b 0d a9 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 76 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc269deac8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f3f2118d9ea RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007ffc269dec00 RBP: 00007ffc269dec80 R08: 00007ffc269deb00 R09: 00007ffc269dec44 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000055f81ab1d220 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:0000000085430378 refcount:1 mapcount:1 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x555c6a81d pfn:0x751ac memcg:ffff888101f7e180 anon flags: 0xfffffc00a0014(uptodate|lru|mappedtodisk|swapbacked|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 000fffffc00a0014 ffffea0001bf2988 ffffea0001de2448 ffff88801712e201 raw: 0000000555c6a81d 0000000000000000 0000000100000000 ffff888101f7e180 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8880751acd80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751ace00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff8880751ace80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ ffff8880751acf00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751acf80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ================================================================== The reason is that struct ATTR_RECORD->name_offset is 6485, end address of name string is out of bounds. Fix this by adding sanity check on end address of attribute name string. [[email protected]: coding-style cleanups] [[email protected]: cleanup suggested by Hawkins Jiawei] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]> Cc: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Cc: Yongqiang Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Yi <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Xiaoxu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
…loc() commit d29f59051d3a07b81281b2df2b8c9dfe4716067f upstream. The voice allocator sometimes begins allocating from near the end of the array and then wraps around, however snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc() accesses the newly allocated voices as if it never wrapped around. This results in out of bounds access if the first voice has a high enough index so that first_voice + requested_voice_count > NUM_G (64). The more voices are requested, the more likely it is for this to occur. This was initially discovered using PipeWire, however it can be reproduced by calling aplay multiple times with 16 channels: aplay -r 48000 -D plughw:CARD=Live,DEV=3 -c 16 /dev/zero UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c:127:40 index 65 is out of range for type 'snd_emu10k1_voice [64]' CPU: 1 PID: 31977 Comm: aplay Tainted: G W IOE 6.0.0-rc2-emu10k1+ exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC P5W DH Deluxe/P5W DH Deluxe, BIOS 3002 07/22/2010 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x3f __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x44/0x49 snd_emu10k1_playback_hw_params+0x3bc/0x420 [snd_emu10k1] snd_pcm_hw_params+0x29f/0x600 [snd_pcm] snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x188/0x1410 [snd_pcm] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x27/0x40 [snd_pcm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Signed-off-by: Tasos Sahanidis <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Jan 30, 2025
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] #8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 #9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 #10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 #11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 #12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde #13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b #14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 #15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a #16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 #17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca #18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2025
commit 38c9c22a85aeed28d0831f230136e9cf6fa2ed44 upstream. Syzkaller reported use-after-free bug as follows: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 Read of size 2 at addr ffff8880751acee8 by task a.out/879 CPU: 7 PID: 879 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-next-20220630-00001-gcc5218c8bd2c-dirty exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x1c0/0x2b0 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0xd4/0x484 print_report.cold+0x55/0x232 kasan_report+0xbf/0xf0 ntfs_ucsncmp+0x123/0x130 ntfs_are_names_equal.cold+0x2b/0x41 ntfs_attr_find+0x43b/0xb90 ntfs_attr_lookup+0x16d/0x1e0 ntfs_read_locked_attr_inode+0x4aa/0x2360 ntfs_attr_iget+0x1af/0x220 ntfs_read_locked_inode+0x246c/0x5120 ntfs_iget+0x132/0x180 load_system_files+0x1cc6/0x3480 ntfs_fill_super+0xa66/0x1cf0 mount_bdev+0x38d/0x460 legacy_get_tree+0x10d/0x220 vfs_get_tree+0x93/0x300 do_new_mount+0x2da/0x6d0 path_mount+0x496/0x19d0 __x64_sys_mount+0x284/0x300 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 RIP: 0033:0x7f3f2118d9ea Code: 48 8b 0d a9 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 76 f4 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc269deac8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f3f2118d9ea RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007ffc269dec00 RBP: 00007ffc269dec80 R08: 00007ffc269deb00 R09: 00007ffc269dec44 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000055f81ab1d220 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:0000000085430378 refcount:1 mapcount:1 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x555c6a81d pfn:0x751ac memcg:ffff888101f7e180 anon flags: 0xfffffc00a0014(uptodate|lru|mappedtodisk|swapbacked|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 000fffffc00a0014 ffffea0001bf2988 ffffea0001de2448 ffff88801712e201 raw: 0000000555c6a81d 0000000000000000 0000000100000000 ffff888101f7e180 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8880751acd80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751ace00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff8880751ace80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ ffff8880751acf00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff8880751acf80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ================================================================== The reason is that struct ATTR_RECORD->name_offset is 6485, end address of name string is out of bounds. Fix this by adding sanity check on end address of attribute name string. [[email protected]: coding-style cleanups] [[email protected]: cleanup suggested by Hawkins Jiawei] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]> Cc: ChenXiaoSong <[email protected]> Cc: Yongqiang Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Yi <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Xiaoxu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2025
…loc() commit d29f59051d3a07b81281b2df2b8c9dfe4716067f upstream. The voice allocator sometimes begins allocating from near the end of the array and then wraps around, however snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc() accesses the newly allocated voices as if it never wrapped around. This results in out of bounds access if the first voice has a high enough index so that first_voice + requested_voice_count > NUM_G (64). The more voices are requested, the more likely it is for this to occur. This was initially discovered using PipeWire, however it can be reproduced by calling aplay multiple times with 16 channels: aplay -r 48000 -D plughw:CARD=Live,DEV=3 -c 16 /dev/zero UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c:127:40 index 65 is out of range for type 'snd_emu10k1_voice [64]' CPU: 1 PID: 31977 Comm: aplay Tainted: G W IOE 6.0.0-rc2-emu10k1+ exynos-linux-stable#7 Hardware name: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC P5W DH Deluxe/P5W DH Deluxe, BIOS 3002 07/22/2010 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x3f __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x44/0x49 snd_emu10k1_playback_hw_params+0x3bc/0x420 [snd_emu10k1] snd_pcm_hw_params+0x29f/0x600 [snd_pcm] snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x188/0x1410 [snd_pcm] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x27/0x40 [snd_pcm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Signed-off-by: Tasos Sahanidis <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
somestupidgirl
pushed a commit
to somestupidgirl/exynos-linux-stable
that referenced
this issue
Feb 2, 2025
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 xxmustafacooTR#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d xxmustafacooTR#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 xxmustafacooTR#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b exynos-linux-stable#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb exynos-linux-stable#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 exynos-linux-stable#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos-linux-stable#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] #8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 #9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 #10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 #11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 #12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde #13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b #14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 #15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a #16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 #17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca #18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I can't get the kernel to compile due to the error:
I don't know what to do to fix this error
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: