-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mark SEXP
both Send
and Sync
#201
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
/bindings |
1 similar comment
/bindings |
/bindings |
with them...
and adjusted CI to test with layouts, and then to save without layout tests
so that we can make it Send / Sync
if I'm not using the newly generated ones?
CGMossa
force-pushed
the
wrap_sexp_send_sync
branch
from
November 18, 2023 17:19
71d7b73
to
3bd48ac
Compare
I don't agree with this PR anymore. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While investigating extendr/extendr#659 it became very clear, that atleast the unsafety associated with R's
SEXP
should be handled byextendr
or any other library that piggybacks on these bindings.Depends on