Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider being more flexible with new format ID fields #20

Open
ross-spencer opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider being more flexible with new format ID fields #20

ross-spencer opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ross-spencer
Copy link
Member

The changes to #19 persist a certain amount of rigidity with SF fields. In another implementation, we can simply ignore changes to the Siegfried structure - other's might say knowing about changes is useful, but we shouldn't have to react to changes that don't effect the overall functionality of the code.

We can:

  1. Ignore issues with ID imports by default.
  2. Have a strict mode that measures conformance with a schema.

Really, ID tools change so little, and this code is used only by myself, so it's not a huge priority.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant