You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nothing sorry, I was convinced that by default usesloppyprecision = single, instead, I guess it is double=8. With double precision, it produces the error
# TM_QUDA: Time for loadCloverQuda 4.007330e-04 s level: 3 proc_id: 0 /HMC/correlators_measurement/invert_eo_quda/loadCloverQuda
# TM_QUDA: mu = 0.001200000000, kappa = 0.140065000000, csw = 1.740000000000
# TM_QUDA: using MG solver to invert operator with 2kappamu = 0.000336156000
# TM_QUDA: MG level 0, extent of (xyzt) dim 0: 8
# TM_QUDA: MG aggregation size set to: 1
# TM_QUDA: MG level 0, extent of (xyzt) dim 1: 8
# TM_QUDA: MG aggregation size set to: 2
# TM_QUDA: MG level 0, extent of (xyzt) dim 2: 8
# TM_QUDA: MG aggregation size set to: 2
# TM_QUDA: MG level 0, extent of (xyzt) dim 3: 4
# TM_QUDA: MG aggregation size set to: 2
# TM_QUDA: MG setting coarse mu scaling factor on level 0 to 1.000000
# TM_QUDA: MG setting coarse mu scaling factor on level 1 to 1.000000
# TM_QUDA: Destroying MG Preconditioner Setup
# TM_QUDA: Performing MG Preconditioner Setup for gauge_id: 6.001000
# TM_QUDA: Generating MG Setup with mu = 0.001199994860 instead of 0.001200000000
MG level 0 (GPU): ERROR: Precisions 4 8 do not match (/qbigwork/garofalo/quda/lib/coarse_op.cu:165 in calculateY())
(rank 0, host lnode15.cluster.hiskp, lattice_field.h:795 in Precision_())
I notice this because I forgot to add usesloppyprecision = single, I am not sure whether this should be addressed, maybe it is not relevant for physical applications
Nothing sorry, I was convinced that by default
usesloppyprecision = single
, instead, I guess it is double=8. With double precision, it produces the errorI notice this because I forgot to add
usesloppyprecision = single
, I am not sure whether this should be addressed, maybe it is not relevant for physical applicationsOriginally posted by @Marcogarofalo in #529 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: