We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@coder2020official
Looks like we need to redesign ChatMemberXXX family. Currently we have all-in-one ChatMember, but it does not correspond to API.
https://core.telegram.org/bots/api#chatmember
I don't remeber why it is done like this now, I suppose we left it for compatibility...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll take a look into it.
I don't remember any backward compatibility choices, though. All I remember is that Swiss was the one to implement it :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
AFAIR some time before there was a single class ChatMember, which was later split into children. Thus we save full ChatMember to leave compatibility.
not really having time rn. Could you do so?
No branches or pull requests
@coder2020official
Looks like we need to redesign ChatMemberXXX family. Currently we have all-in-one ChatMember, but it does not correspond to API.
https://core.telegram.org/bots/api#chatmember
I don't remeber why it is done like this now, I suppose we left it for compatibility...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: