Open
Description
@theurich or other gurus,
I recently tried to add support for netcdf in my discover tests via an ugly modulefile which exposes a Baselibs build of netcdf. As in:
13.2.0:
compiler: comp/gcc/13.2.0
netcdf: other/esmf-netcdf/gfortran_13.2.0-openmpi_4.1.6
extra_module: cmake/3.30.3
mpi:
openmpi:
module: mpi/openmpi/4.1.6/gcc-13.2.0
The thing is, I'd also like an mpiuni case but I can't expose a netcdf built with MPI to an mpiuni
case. So, at the moment I've done the following where my mpiuni
is now using a different compiler:
13.2.0:
compiler: comp/gcc/13.2.0
netcdf: other/esmf-netcdf/gfortran_13.2.0-openmpi_4.1.6
extra_module: cmake/3.30.3
mpi:
openmpi:
module: mpi/openmpi/4.1.6/gcc-13.2.0
14.2.0:
compiler: comp/gcc/14.2.0
netcdf: None
extra_module: cmake/3.30.3
mpi:
mpiuni:
module: none
But I'd like to move those ugly modulefiles to a less public directory just because I don't want people seeing them. But that means I need to add a new module_path
and from my read of the python, module_path
(at the top for a machine) does not expect a list.
So I wonder, could this work:
13.2.0:
compiler: comp/gcc/13.2.0
extra_module: cmake/3.30.3
mpi:
openmpi:
module_path: /path/to/ugly/modulefiles
netcdf: other/esmf-netcdf/gfortran_13.2.0-openmpi_4.1.6
module: mpi/openmpi/4.1.6/gcc-13.2.0
mpi:
mpiuni:
module: none
netcdf: none
That is, I don't know how deep you can put some of these keys.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels