Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GainSchedIdentifier: ignoring given indices not implemented #145

Open
steinelg opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

GainSchedIdentifier: ignoring given indices not implemented #145

steinelg opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@steinelg
Labels
Gain-Scheduling known-limitation ideally fix, but may not always be easily doable
Milestone
1.4

Comments

@steinelg
Copy link
Collaborator

steinelg commented Nov 5, 2024

No description provided.

@steinelg steinelg added the known-limitation ideally fix, but may not always be easily doable label Nov 5, 2024
@steinelg steinelg added this to the 1.4 milestone Nov 5, 2024
@steinelg steinelg self-assigned this Nov 5, 2024
@steinelg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

steinelg commented Nov 6, 2024

IgnoreIndicesInMiddleOfDataset_ResultShouldStillBeGood is implemented to test this functionality, but currently time-constants are a bit low, needs further work. Steady-state gains seems to be correct, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@steinelg steinelg

Labels
Gain-Scheduling known-limitation ideally fix, but may not always be easily doable
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.4
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@steinelg