Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

assess for pak::func() or func() consistency #42

Open
avallecam opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

assess for pak::func() or func() consistency #42

avallecam opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@avallecam
Copy link
Member

Be consistent in your usage of pak::func() or just use the func(). It is a personal choice, but I prefer the first option. Because it helps to avoid confusion.

Originally posted by @Degoot-AM in #37 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@avallecam