Proposal to Improve Code Readability and current_position Handling in CursorPagination #9578
Unanswered
bae-code
asked this question in
Ideas & Suggestions
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I'd like to propose some changes to improve code readability and the handling of current_position in the CursorPagination class by addressing variable naming confusion.
Background and Problem
current_position is not None
is used repeatedly throughout the code, which reduces readability.Proposed Changes
has_current_position = current_position is not None
to reduce the repetitive use of the condition.reverse
→cursor_reverse
(represents the client's request direction)is_reversed
→is_ordering_reversed
(represents the ordering field's direction)filter_queryset_by_cursor
method to separate the filtering logic from paginate_queryset.paginate_queryset
method now handles ordering and checks the existence of current_position, while thefilter_queryset_by_cursor
method handles the filtering based on the cursor position.Current Code:
Modified Code Example:
Benefits of the Changes
Improved Code Readability:
has_current_position
, we reduce the repetitive use of the condition and enhance code clarity.reverse
andself.cursor.reverse
, making the purpose of each variable clear.Enhanced Code Structure:
filter_queryset_by_cursor
method increases modularity and reusability.paginate_queryset
method is now more focused on its primary responsibilities.Request for Feedback:
I believe these changes will have a positive impact on the project.
I would appreciate any feedback or suggestions from the maintainers and the community.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts or additional ideas.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions