You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Enum and bitfield properties may have different definitions across planes. This would be silly and annoying, but could happen. For instance, plane 1 may have "rotation": bitmask {"rotate-90" = 0x1, "rotate-180" = 0x2} and plane 2 may have "rotation": bitmask {"rotate-180" = 0x1}.
In this case, library users don't know which value needs to be set without knowing the plane that will be used. In the rotation example, rotate-180 has value 0x1 or 0x2 depending on the plane used.
I'm not aware of any property that behaves like this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Enum and bitfield properties may have different definitions across planes. This would be silly and annoying, but could happen. For instance, plane 1 may have
"rotation": bitmask {"rotate-90" = 0x1, "rotate-180" = 0x2}
and plane 2 may have"rotation": bitmask {"rotate-180" = 0x1}
.In this case, library users don't know which value needs to be set without knowing the plane that will be used. In the
rotation
example,rotate-180
has value 0x1 or 0x2 depending on the plane used.I'm not aware of any property that behaves like this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: