Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the feastol option (absolute vs. relative). #172

Open
Viech opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Question about the feastol option (absolute vs. relative). #172

Viech opened this issue Jan 23, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@Viech
Copy link

Viech commented Jan 23, 2019

Hello,

I wonder if the feastol option refers to an absolute measure of feasibility violation, or if the violation is measured in relation to the magnitude of other numbers that appear in the problem. For instance, CVXOPT divides the 2-norm of the vector of violations by the 2-norm of the right hand side (constant) part of all constraints (see here).

I looked at the code, but I did not understand the meaning of the factors that make up the "primal residual" that is compared to feastol:

info->pres = MAX(nry, nrz) / w->tau;
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant