Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider migration to CDI kernel #3

Open
moshloop opened this issue Mar 7, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Consider migration to CDI kernel #3

moshloop opened this issue Mar 7, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@zifamathebula

Comments

@moshloop
Copy link

moshloop commented Mar 7, 2017

to provide motivation to migrate to CDI kernel vs migrate to CDI API areas of concern:

  1. KISS / Hack Free,
  2. Migration benefit must outway cost
  3. Unified and consistent annotations
  4. Configurable schedules from properties i.e. @Schedule("${schedule.interval?60")
  5. Updatable properties at runtime i.e. @PropertyChanged
  6. @Singleton for clusters
  7. @Inject(nullable=true)
  8. Untyped, clusterable, embeddable, persistent message/event bus
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@zifamathebula zifamathebula

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@moshloop @zifamathebula