Replies: 3 comments 7 replies
-
In general more *tools would make more sense in PDE IMO, because the target audience are plugin developers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are 2 different kind of tools that shouldn't be treated the same way if we want to do the "right thing" (tm):
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So can we agree to at least move org.eclipse.swt.tools.spies to PDE then like we already did with the e4 spies (+the feature)? Also I wonder if we need to build/deploy/release the JNI generator at all it seems more like a tool used inside the IDE (where it does not matter it depends on platform) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently we have some
org.eclipse.swt.tools
bundles (and a feature) in the SWT repo.These depend on the RCP platform and therefore create a cyclic dependency to the platform repo (e.g. requires an i-builds repository). Also these are not really useful in a standalone SWT application therefore.
As platform already always uses latest SWT and we have a combinde/build/release it seems more suitable to have these things in the platfrom repo (like JFace) to decouple SWT more, and make it more independent.
The only dependency to platform will then be the target (for JSVG) and the parent pom, both things are "lightweight" and can be replaced easily with something in SWT directly if required.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions