-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plan for 2.0.0-M12 🎯 #1468
Comments
Other questions, a Californium release could be planned for 20.07.2023. |
@sbernard31 I just talked to @sag-eweingaertner and we really appreciate the progress you've made on SNI. We'd like to test and review your changes and at the same time we don't want SNI to be a blocker for M12 release. If we need SNI support urgently we'll just create a custom build, but I don't think it will be necessary - we'll probably need it later at the end of this year. |
@jakubsobolewskisag, thx for prompt answer. |
I updated some dependencies before the release : #1469 |
I added some little polish with #1470 which should be integrated in M12 I think that :
About :
In all case, let me know if you want to review that ☝️ before I integrate it in I also wait for an answer about : #1468 (comment) Once I get your answer( and maybe your review), I will integrate that in |
Currently Leshan use Californium 3.8.0.
(Maybe this could help to decide) |
(Oh I just remember this Friday is 14th July, so a state holiday) |
Orange guys, I must confess that I'm a bit confused because I understood that you wanted ideally the M12 released for this week. Anyway not a big deal, just confusing. Finally just to let you know that the ball is in your court. (I'm back on Monday) |
Thx for feedback.
Just to avoid any misunderstanding : I'm not sure but I guess that you didn't want to refer #1470 ? or maybe I didn't get what you mean ? On my side, I plan to integrate :
I also understand that you prefer the release asap and so don't want to wait for Californium release, right ? |
Just to let you know, we faced some issue with our jenkins instance 😬 : https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/3429 |
That's fine with us.
That's correct |
Ok I already integrated those 2 PR, so 🥶 code freeze in I wait for your green light to trigger the release process. |
As Californium 3.9.0 is now available, and we still didn't release the M12. I ask myself if we should finally integrate it in M12 ? On your side did you start OR do you plan to test Leshan before the release ? |
Following eclipse-californium/californium#2160 (comment), probably better to integrate Californium 3.9.0 after the M12. |
@Warmek could you give me some visibility, let me know if you at Orange plan to test that. |
(Note that I will be unavailable from 31/07 to 15/08 included) |
@slaft thx for letting me know that. 🙏 👷♂️ I will try to start the release process. 🚧 |
✔️ It should be available on maven central now. I will communicate about it on Monday. |
Thanks a lot. |
Communication is done : https://github.com/eclipse-leshan/leshan/releases/tag/leshan-2.0.0-M12 So I close this issue. |
A 2.0.0-M12 release was requested by Orange. (#1467)
If possible Orange would like to have it released this week but that sounds very short delay to me.
So let's start to discuss and plan work to do about it and release it when it will be ready.
What is currently included for M12:
New commits in
master
since M11 :Redis Store Compatibility break :
Note that we break again
RedisRegistrationStore
data format because of : #1445.What is missing ?
Here is some topic that we maybe want in M12 ?
master
because 2 PRs below are not integrated :1. Fix leshanServerBuilder.setUpdateRegistrationOnNotification #1463
1. Add configuration to enable to update registration on send operation. #1464
If you have more ideas, please comments 👇
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: