-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[sugestion] Get more precise start date without log module #94
Comments
I don't think the start timestamp (as an OLE date) is stored anywhere else but in the LOG module. This module also happens to be overwritten if there is an external device (EXTDEV) module. If anyone finds a way around this, instead of relying on file mtime/ctime, I'd also be happy to hear about it. |
Yes it seems that the timestamp is exclusively in the LOG module. And the LOG module is added to the .mpr file when the experiment is ended, before that it is stored in a .mpl LOG file. This could also be done during initialization of the MPRfile class. Same for the LOOP module. @PeterKraus what is the external device module ? I couldn't find it |
Using I think some potentiostats allow you to add an external sensor, such as a temperature and/or pressure sensor (really just a calibrated voltage readout). For the |
dear all !
For the moment, the self.startdate only give the start date in day. For some application, we need more precise launch time ( at least hour base). I now that we can get more precise timing with self.timestamp but for that, we need to end the programe ( creation of the log part). Do you thing it possible to read the the timestamp values at another place in the raw file ? or if the start date is whriten somewhere else more precisely ?
thank you in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: