CRAN RC: 0.8.3

[IndrajeetPatil]

Closes #330

[IndrajeetPatil]

@strengejacke Can you go through the changes in snapshots and confirm that this is expected?

I am surprised how much we have reduced the size of points; they are barely visible.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.57%. Comparing base (bd5b6e1) to head (83e62c4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
R/scale_color_social.R	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
R/scale_color_bluebrown.R	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
R/scale_color_metro.R	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
R/scale_color_pizza.R	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #332      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.89%   43.57%   -0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          67       67              
  Lines        4882     4909      +27     
==========================================
- Hits         2143     2139       -4     
- Misses       2739     2770      +31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[strengejacke]

@strengejacke Can you go through the changes in snapshots and confirm that this is expected?

I am surprised how much we have reduced the size of points; they are barely visible.

Maybe we can revert that? Points looked too big in check_model(), but rather small in single plots.

[strengejacke]

Would you say it's ok now, or increase dot size even more?

[IndrajeetPatil]

Would you say it's ok now, or increase dot size even more?

Yes, looks much better now!