title: Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2 docname: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-tls13-latest category: std updates: 7540
ipr: trust200902 area: Applications and Real-Time workgroup: HTTP
pi: [toc, sortrefs, symrefs] stand_alone: yes
ins: D. Benjamin
name: David Benjamin
organization: Google LLC
email: [email protected]
normative: RFC2119: RFC5246: RFC7230: RFC7301: RFC7540: RFC8446:
informative: RFC8470:
--- abstract
This document updates RFC 7540 by forbidding TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication, as an analog to the existing TLS 1.2 renegotiation restriction.
--- note_Note_to_Readers
RFC EDITOR: please remove this section before publication
Discussion of this draft takes place on the HTTP working group mailing list ([email protected]), which is archived at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/.
Working Group information can be found at https://httpwg.org/; source code and issues list for this draft can be found at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/http2-tls13.
--- middle
TLS 1.2 {{RFC5246}} and earlier support renegotiation, a mechanism for changing parameters and keys partway through a connection. This was sometimes used to implement reactive client authentication in HTTP/1.1 {{RFC7230}}, where the server decides whether to request a client certificate based on the HTTP request.
HTTP/2 {{RFC7540}} multiplexes multiple HTTP requests over a single connection, which is incompatible with the mechanism above. Clients cannot correlate the certificate request with the HTTP request which triggered it. Thus, Section 9.2.1 of {{RFC7540}} forbids renegotiation.
TLS 1.3 {{RFC8446}} updates TLS 1.2 to remove renegotiation in favor of separate post-handshake authentication and key update mechanisms. The former shares the same problems with multiplexed protocols, but the prohibition in {{RFC7540}} only applies to TLS 1.2 renegotiation.
This document updates HTTP/2 to similarly forbid TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 {{RFC2119}} {{!RFC8174}} when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
HTTP/2 servers MUST NOT send post-handshake TLS 1.3 CertificateRequest messages. HTTP/2 clients MUST treat such messages as connection errors (see Section 5.4.1 of {{RFC7540}}) of type PROTOCOL_ERROR.
{{RFC7540}} permitted renegotiation before the HTTP/2 connection preface to provide confidentiality of the client certificate. TLS 1.3 encrypts the client certificate in the initial handshake, so this is no longer necessary. HTTP/2 servers MUST NOT send post-handshake TLS 1.3 CertificateRequest messages before the connection preface.
The above applies even if the client offered the post_handshake_auth TLS
extension. This extension is advertised independently of the selected ALPN
protocol {{RFC7301}}, so it is not sufficient to resolve the conflict with
HTTP/2. HTTP/2 clients that also offer other ALPN protocols, notably HTTP/1.1,
in a TLS ClientHello MAY include the post_handshake_auth extension to support
those other protocols. This does not indicate support in HTTP/2.
{{RFC8446}} defines two other messages that are exchanged after the handshake is complete, KeyUpdate and NewSessionTicket.
KeyUpdate messages only affect TLS itself and do not require any interaction with the application protocol. HTTP/2 implementations MUST support key updates when TLS 1.3 is negotiated.
NewSessionTicket messages are also permitted. Though these interact with HTTP when early data is enabled, these interactions are defined in {{RFC8470}} and allowed for in the design of HTTP/2.
Unless the use of a new type of TLS message depends on an interaction with the application-layer protocol, that TLS message can be sent after the handshake completes.
This document resolves a compatibility concern between HTTP/2 and TLS 1.3 when supporting post-handshake authentication with HTTP/1.1. This lowers the barrier for deploying TLS 1.3, a major security improvement over TLS 1.2.
This document has no IANA actions.
--- back