We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
javap scala.Option produces:
javap scala.Option
public abstract class scala.Option<A> implements scala.collection.IterableOnce<A>, scala.Product, java.io.Serializable { // ... public final scala.Option<A>.WithFilter withFilter(scala.Function1<A, java.lang.Object>); // ... }
The type scala.Option<A>.WithFilter cannot be parsed with the current grammar, so:
scala.Option<A>.WithFilter
unexpected token `... final scala.Option<A> <<< . >>> WithFilter withFilter( ...` at offset 1632, expected one of `["\"\\\"\"", "\"&\"", "\")\"", "\",\"", "\"...\"", "\";\"", "\">\"", "\"[\"", "\"implements\"", "\"{\"", "r#\"[a-zA-Z_$][a-zA-Z0-9_$]*\"#"]`
I assume this should be fixed by extending ClassRef, which currently only expects generics at the end of a dotpath, not in the middle:
ClassRef
duchess/macro/src/class_info/javap_parser.lalrpop
Lines 200 to 203 in 24d14e2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah, this is actually resolved by #102.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
javap scala.Option
produces:The type
scala.Option<A>.WithFilter
cannot be parsed with the current grammar, so:I assume this should be fixed by extending
ClassRef
, which currently only expects generics at the end of a dotpath, not in the middle:duchess/macro/src/class_info/javap_parser.lalrpop
Lines 200 to 203 in 24d14e2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: