You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi , I used pydensac and get prefer results instead of cv2.ransac most of times, thanks for the excellent work!
But I got a trouble and found that give the same input, it would produce unstable results, and some of them even worse than cv2.ransac. Besides, It will keep the same results for about ten times, but when I try dozens of times, the results will be inconsistent. I understand that the algorithm is somewhat random, but is there any way to reduce this randomness as much as possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately, that requires recompilation of the C part of the library. I don't have time now to recompile and check all the python wheelsm but might do it later (created #5 for not forgetting).
However, don't expect it to be done this month.
hi thanks for the reply! I tried but got an error like this
seems rand() doesn't accpet any arguments.
I guess seed = rand() should generates a different value every time? so I tried seed=time(NULL). Seem it gets worse results, and didn't solve my problem:(.
Am I doing right?
Hi , I used pydensac and get prefer results instead of cv2.ransac most of times, thanks for the excellent work!
But I got a trouble and found that give the same input, it would produce unstable results, and some of them even worse than cv2.ransac. Besides, It will keep the same results for about ten times, but when I try dozens of times, the results will be inconsistent. I understand that the algorithm is somewhat random, but is there any way to reduce this randomness as much as possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: