-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sersic fit yields significant bias in flux #108
Comments
Hi, If your PSF is not well sampled, then the Tractor code is definitely not guaranteed to produce correct results. I believe that if you make your model image large enough, then the total flux in the Tractor model should equal your model flux. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I'm struggling with the tractor to photometer Galsim-simulated galaxy profiles. I found that the tractor fit typically underestimates given fluxes, and the Gaussian mixture model flux for a Sersic profile is generally higher than the one generated from Galsim with the same total flux. This bias seems to depend on shear, size of the PSF, size of the source, sersic index, etc.
Below are some of results,
this is the profile of the Galsim and tractor model with Gaussian PSF of sigma = 5 pix.
If this model is optimized then it gives slightly lower flux.
If I apply some shear, then the flux of the tractor mod gets boosted and the optimized flux gives underestimated value.
This bias gets even worse for smaller PSF (I'm handling images of which PSF width < 1 pix)
This behavior is also depends on sersic index and half light radius.
Freezing all shape parameters and thawing only brightness still show this bias..
I checked the legacy survey photometry and COSMOS2020 The Farmer catalog, but in these catalog this bias seems to be somehow corrected, or not existed at the first place.
Did you recognize this flux bias? Then how did you resolve this for the legacy survey photometry?
If not, did I make a mistake?
Thank you for your amazing work on the tractor by the way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: