-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactoring relation and fact schema #18
Comments
In introducing an intermediate relation node for the ground-truth, do we want the type to be An argument for An argument for |
I'm leaning to So, just to be concrete, the tweak we are suggesting is to take fact (Q355 "Facebook", hq, Q74195 "Menlo Park") and create:
This also allows the mention "Menlo Park" in text to be linked to Q74195. |
And furthermore, I would change to |
Currently, our schema for relations and facts looks something like this:
There's an asymmetry here, as relations are reified with an explicit relation node. We should refactor to make more consistent.
(also, to me,
object_of
relation has the directionality reversed)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: