Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meeting constraint #62

Open
carduz opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

meeting constraint #62

carduz opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@carduz
Copy link
Member

carduz commented Dec 30, 2015

I think that this can be an improvement for the backend check since it is implemented frontend side and even if a guy doesn't respect this constraint the system is still able to optimise (in fact the system doesn't consider timeslots that doesn't respect the constraint)

In my opinion it is not easy implement this constraint backend side, it is expensive. In fact we have to check for each timeslot created the old timeslots in the database. we have also to consider the case where the user insert timeslots before the current date.

So I think that the best approach is writing all constraints on the frontend site and on the API documentation. In fact the user can perform this actions but the system doesn't consider them.

P.S. another constraint is that the user cannot update the timeslots after a meeting is planed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant