Skip to content

arm64 Helix reporter script error #39371

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
BruceForstall opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

arm64 Helix reporter script error #39371

BruceForstall opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
area-Infrastructure test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely)
Milestone

Comments

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Contributor

On net5.0-Windows_NT-Release-arm64-CoreCLR_checked-tailcallstress-Windows.10.Arm64.Open failure in System.Collections.Concurrent.Tests Work Item of this pipeline:

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=730506&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=22603680&resultId=148545&paneView=dotnet-dnceng.dnceng-build-release-tasks.helix-test-information-tab

This log file:

https://helixre107v0xdeko0k025g8.blob.core.windows.net/dotnet-runtime-refs-heads-master-d32317c5455049499b/System.Collections.Concurrent.Tests/console.af5cc3b8.log?sv=2019-02-02&se=2020-08-04T11%3A44%3A51Z&sr=c&sp=rl&sig=t1K49s9fAEZTijJHE6KY92Mh%2Fy6pZF%2FTK7Tn01fggSo%3D

  File "C:\dotnetbuild\work\d32317c5-4550-4949-9b46-eeebdd0fda86\Payload\reporter\run.py", line 48
    def process_args() -> Tuple[str, str, str, Optional[str]]:
                       ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 Wed 07/15/2020- 6:45:30.39
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\dotnetbuild\work\d32317c5-4550-4949-9b46-eeebdd0fda86\Payload\xunit-reporter.py", line 124, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
  File "C:\dotnetbuild\work\d32317c5-4550-4949-9b46-eeebdd0fda86\Payload\xunit-reporter.py", line 79, in main
    upload_dir = settings.workitem_upload_dir
AttributeError: WorkItemSettings instance has no attribute 'workitem_upload_dir'

Related to #39244?

@MattGal PTAL

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 15, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @ViktorHofer
Notify danmosemsft if you want to be subscribed.

@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 15, 2020
@ericstj ericstj added test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely) and removed untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Jul 28, 2020
@ericstj ericstj added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Jul 28, 2020
@ericstj
Copy link
Member

ericstj commented Jul 28, 2020

@MattGal does this look like an old python version on arm64 helix client? Seems python isn't understanding function annotations.

@MattGal
Copy link
Member

MattGal commented Jul 28, 2020

@ericstj yes I've been raising this issue with folks on my team but you're the first customer caring about it. It's not understanding function annotations because it's one of the 10 boxes that is still running python 2.x. We should take those machines offline; let me chat with @ilyas1974 .

@MattGal
Copy link
Member

MattGal commented Jul 28, 2020

All 10 "Seattle" Arm64 boxes are offline now; per @ilyas1974 there seems to be some overly helpful lab engineer putting them back online when he takes them off. Since I offlined them from the Helix API, they shouldn't take work now even if they are on, heartbeating, and wasting electricity.

@ericstj
Copy link
Member

ericstj commented Jul 28, 2020

you're the first customer caring about it.

Just triaging. :)

Thanks for the update, if possible it'd be good to get a new python on them and have them online. Aren't our ARM64 devices a scarce resource?

Closing this for now as it is understood and mitigated.

@ericstj ericstj closed this as completed Jul 28, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-Infrastructure test-bug Problem in test source code (most likely)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants