Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance lower than reported #4

Open
chenz97 opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Performance lower than reported #4

chenz97 opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@chenz97
Copy link

chenz97 commented Jun 18, 2020

Hi, thank you for your great work and code!

I ran your training code of node classification by make test_phase=1 save_dir=save, but have found that the performance on the validation set is relatively low at accuracy : 0.4146, hit ratio : 0.5090, macro f1 : 0.2762, expected return : -0.0087, which seems to be much lower than the figures reported in the paper.

Is there any configurations that should be modified to reproduce your results? Thank you very much!

@280777510
Copy link

Hi, thank you for your great work and code!

I ran your training code of node classification by make test_phase=1 save_dir=save, but have found that the performance on the validation set is relatively low at accuracy : 0.4146, hit ratio : 0.5090, macro f1 : 0.2762, expected return : -0.0087, which seems to be much lower than the figures reported in the paper.

Is there any configurations that should be modified to reproduce your results? Thank you very much!
Hello, I cannot download the stock data and Wikipedia relationship data provided in the original paper, could you please give me a copy?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants