We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
any chance instead of returning Strings you could return Path objects? or does a Path end up not resolving correctly somehow?
Path
also I feel like it would be better to abstract behind methods even if this ends up looking like a record api for now.
record
e.g
ProjectDirectories::cacheDir() // Path
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Back then Path was too new for the Java version supported, but I think now it's fine, so PR welcome! (Please wait after #61 is merged, though.)
Sorry, something went wrong.
When was back then? Wasn't Path introduced in like Java 6? My first version was 7 and I'm pretty sure it was already there.
Path came in 7, the baseline for this library was Java 6.
No branches or pull requests
any chance instead of returning Strings you could return
Path
objects? or does aPath
end up not resolving correctly somehow?also I feel like it would be better to abstract behind methods even if this ends up looking like a
record
api for now.e.g
ProjectDirectories::cacheDir() // Path
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: