You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We would like to compare performance of tiling the same dataset using titiler-pgstac (COGs) and titiler-xarray (Zarr)
We believe this is the best approximation of comparing tiling between the two approaches because of the following methodology:
Assume you are starting with a known collection
Metadata read step
a. For COG: you register a query with pgstac for the collection id, variable and time step of interest
b. For Zarr: You read consolidated metadata and "lazily load" the variable and time step (slice) of interest
c. For now - I'm going to store both of these metadata components (pgstac and kerchunk reference) locally, but it might be of interest to move pgSTAC and kerchunk to the cloud...
Generate tiles
a. COG: use mosaic ID to read chunks from COGs on S3
b. Zarr: Use zarr metadata to read chunks from NetCDFs or Zarrs on S3
There is a public archive of COGs generated for CMIP6 for a VEDA related dashboard, using NetCDFs we have stored in S3 as well. There is a public archive is here: https://nex-gddp-cmip6-cog.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ and we have the original NetCDFs in S3 as well. So we can:
abarciauskas-bgse
changed the title
Profile tiling using mosaics and COGs with titiler-pgSTAC
titiler-pgstac profiling using mosaics + COGs
May 23, 2023
abarciauskas-bgse
changed the title
titiler-pgstac profiling using mosaics + COGs
titiler-pgstac profiling using mosaics + COGs (CMIP6 Monthly TAS on AWS PDS)
May 23, 2023
abarciauskas-bgse
changed the title
titiler-pgstac profiling using mosaics + COGs (CMIP6 Monthly TAS on AWS PDS)
titiler-pgstac and titiler-xarray code profiling using CMIP6 Monthly TAS on AWS PDS
May 23, 2023
abarciauskas-bgse
changed the title
titiler-pgstac and titiler-xarray code profiling using CMIP6 Monthly TAS on AWS PDS
titiler-pgstac and titiler-xarray code profiling using CMIP6 Daily TAS on AWS PDS
Jun 20, 2023
Execution of the work described in stac-utils/titiler-pgstac#97, specifically stac-utils/titiler-pgstac#97 (comment), copying most content that discussion.
Description
We would like to compare performance of tiling the same dataset using titiler-pgstac (COGs) and titiler-xarray (Zarr)
We believe this is the best approximation of comparing tiling between the two approaches because of the following methodology:
a. For COG: you register a query with pgstac for the collection id, variable and time step of interest
b. For Zarr: You read consolidated metadata and "lazily load" the variable and time step (slice) of interest
c. For now - I'm going to store both of these metadata components (pgstac and kerchunk reference) locally, but it might be of interest to move pgSTAC and kerchunk to the cloud...
a. COG: use mosaic ID to read chunks from COGs on S3
b. Zarr: Use zarr metadata to read chunks from NetCDFs or Zarrs on S3
There is a public archive of COGs generated for CMIP6 for a VEDA related dashboard, using NetCDFs we have stored in S3 as well. There is a public archive is here: https://nex-gddp-cmip6-cog.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ and we have the original NetCDFs in S3 as well. So we can:
For titiler-pgstac:
For titiler-xarray
For both:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: