-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SKYTHRURMS on 20240821, tiles 27156, 27117, expid 249649-249651 #207
Comments
What are SKYTHRUMS?
Klaus
From: Eddie Schlafly ***@***.***>
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at 1:16 PM
To: desihub/desisurveyops ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [desihub/desisurveyops] SKYTHRURMS on 20240821, tiles 27156, 27117, expid 249649-249651 (Issue #207)
QA reports large SKYTHRURMS on 20240821, tiles 27156, 27117, expid 249649 - 249651. I don't actually see anything wrong with the data and can't think of a case where SKYTHRURMS has told us something useful before, so I don't really know what
QA reports large SKYTHRURMS on 20240821, tiles 27156, 27117, expid 249649 - 249651. I don't actually see anything wrong with the data and can't think of a case where SKYTHRURMS has told us something useful before, so I don't really know what to do with this. 249650 & 249651 are particularly interesting because almost all R cameras have high SKYTHRURMS but the BZ cameras do not, and we expect TPCORR to be fairly achromatic. These are bright tiles with pretty fine looking redshifts, so I'm inclined to ignore them, but @julienguy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/julienguy__;!!KGKeukY!0uwV2NDJ1L2hVOhODmmEy0t0vxe1xdthpxig9VhE4Tx9Wtf_9-eV0ar78fUseyOtICsrqvKtani92JWbcf4vCM5GmQ$> expressed some interest in these tiles.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/desihub/desisurveyops/issues/207__;!!KGKeukY!0uwV2NDJ1L2hVOhODmmEy0t0vxe1xdthpxig9VhE4Tx9Wtf_9-eV0ar78fUseyOtICsrqvKtani92JWbcf67BbvRsw$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQ5P646J55VEYVESVUMA63ZTSX5FAVCNFSM6AAAAABNGSOHJ6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQ4DSOJUGUZTMNY__;!!KGKeukY!0uwV2NDJ1L2hVOhODmmEy0t0vxe1xdthpxig9VhE4Tx9Wtf_9-eV0ar78fUseyOtICsrqvKtani92JWbcf63DHE-iQ$>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
it s formally computed here (it s a per-exposure, per {petal,camera} measurement):
|
Yeah, that was our question when we saw those alerts too---we don't see them very often. It's the spread in "TPCORR", which is intended to be a measure of how consistent the sky amplitudes are among the different fibers. i.e., our expectation is that the sky fibers can be used to subtract the sky from the science fibers, but there is some code that tries to compute a per-fiber sky amplitude (TPCORR) based on the sky lines; this is reporting that the variance in those TPCORR measurements is larger than nominal. I don't understand it yet. |
about those three exposures:
|
For the record, we marked these tiles as |
QA reports large SKYTHRURMS on 20240821, tiles 27156, 27117, expid 249649 - 249651. I don't actually see anything wrong with the data and can't think of a case where SKYTHRURMS has told us something useful before, so I don't really know what to do with this. 249650 & 249651 are particularly interesting because almost all R cameras have high SKYTHRURMS but the BZ cameras do not, and we expect TPCORR to be fairly achromatic. These are bright tiles with pretty fine looking redshifts, so I'm inclined to ignore them, but @julienguy expressed some interest in these tiles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: