-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add highway hash #4
Comments
Is this a request that I add it? Or will you hack up a patch for me Damian?
Yves
…On 11 January 2018 at 16:46, Damian Gryski ***@***.***> wrote:
https://github.com/google/highwayhash
There's a portable C version that will be easier to integrate but won't
have the same performance as the SIMD-optimized one but still should give
representative results for the quality of the hash if not the speed. I
don't know the speed difference between the two, but for Go my assembly
version with SIMD was 10x faster than the pure-Go version.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGex2xvf9T7xF4KW2SyRsahvJ3uUdmVks5tJizTgaJpZM4RbBV8>
.
--
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
|
Either or both :D . I might be able to get to it this weekend, but otherwise I'm pretty busy. |
ghost
mentioned this issue
Jan 12, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://github.com/google/highwayhash
There's a portable C version that will be easier to integrate but won't have the same performance as the SIMD-optimized one but still should give representative results for the quality of the hash if not the speed. I don't know the speed difference between the two, but for Go my assembly version with SIMD was 10x faster than the pure-Go version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: