Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

estat: would like to have size summary stats #11

Open
sebroy opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

estat: would like to have size summary stats #11

sebroy opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@sebroy
Copy link
Contributor

sebroy commented Nov 19, 2019

When outputing size histograms with -z, it would be good to also have size data in the summary stats at the end. Right now, even with -z, the summary stats only show latency stats.

@sebroy sebroy changed the title would like to have size summary stats estat: would like to have size summary stats Nov 19, 2019
@brad-lewis
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure what you are asking for. Here is an example from the zpl collection. Throughput is based on size. Do you want average size columns for "zfs_read async", "zfs_write async", and "total"?

   bytes                                                 zfs_write async
value range                 count ------------- Distribution ------------- 
[8K, 16K)                      76 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@        
[16K, 32K)                     19 |@@@@@@@@                                
[32K, 64K)                      1 |@                                       

                                       iops(/s)  avg latency(us)       stddev(us)  throughput(k/s)
zfs_read async                                0               98                0                8
zfs_write async                               9               69             2552              960


                                       iops(/s)  throughput(k/s)
total                                         9              968

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants