Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider use of Flight POJOs instead of protobufs #6295

Open
devinrsmith opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider use of Flight POJOs instead of protobufs #6295

devinrsmith opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature request New feature or request triage
Milestone

Comments

@devinrsmith
Copy link
Member

While implementing #5339, I wished I could have used the Flight POJOs (org.apache.arrow.flight) everywhere instead of the Flight protobufs (org.apache.arrow.flight.impl); while it would be a breaking change, it would be relatively straightforward to update all of our code save for the grpc sending layer, to work directly with Flight POJOs.

For example, io.deephaven.server.session.ActionResolver was implemented with org.apache.arrow.flight.Action, org.apache.arrow.flight.ActionType, and org.apache.arrow.flight.Result as opposed to org.apache.arrow.flight.impl.Flight.Action, org.apache.arrow.flight.impl.Flight.ActionType, and org.apache.arrow.flight.impl.Flight.Result.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request triage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant