Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the new JWT-VC 2.0 format #1132

Open
astanciu opened this issue Feb 22, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Support the new JWT-VC 2.0 format #1132

astanciu opened this issue Feb 22, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pinned don't close this just for being stale

Comments

@astanciu
Copy link

There's a newly released native JWT VC representation spec, Version 2, here:
https://w3c.github.io/vc-jwt/#version-2

Some context available in this post here:
https://self-issued.info/?p=2316

Any plans to support this in the @veramo/credential-w3c ? Or is this a question better asked in the underly package, did-jwt-vc?

@astanciu astanciu added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 22, 2023
@mirceanis
Copy link
Member

Yes, we do plan to adopt the new spec as well.

The work will be mostly in did-jwt-vc, but we'll also have to make sure that everything works here too

@astanciu
Copy link
Author

Hi, curious if there's any updates on this front. Or curious how vermao plans to implement JWT2 support. Will there be a config option to use v1.1 or v2 or will the library switch to support only v2? Any estimated timeframes or other dependencies that you are waiting on?

Thanks

@mirceanis
Copy link
Member

Yes, we will be adding support for v2. It's still too early to talk about that support now or how that would look like in practice.

@mirceanis mirceanis added the pinned don't close this just for being stale label Aug 30, 2023
@nickz-t3
Copy link

What is the state with this?

@mirceanis
Copy link
Member

What is the state with this?

wow, it's been a while.
We had a team volunteering to work on an implementation of VC2.0 in Veramo but so far there hasn't been any progress update.

If you'd like to raise a PR with an implementation, please say so :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pinned don't close this just for being stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants