Allowing multiple spanning headers with modify_spanning_header(level)
#2105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* gtsummary setup complete * adding gt tests * spanning header footnotes
edelarua
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
Thank you for the review @edelarua !! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
modify_spanning_header(level)argument has been added to allow for multiple levels of spanning headers in the resulting tables. Theremove_spanning_header()function has also been added to ease the removal of spanning headers. (Spanning header updates #2099)modify_footnote_spanning_header()function has been added to ease adding footnotes to spanning headers. A companion function,remove_footnote_spanning_header(), has been added to remove spanning headers.If there is an GitHub issue associated with this pull request, please provide link.
closes #2099
closes #2108
Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)
pkgdown::build_site(). Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website.devtools::test_coverage()usethis::use_spell_check()runs with no spelling errors in documentationWhen the branch is ready to be merged into master:
NEWS.mdwith the changes from this pull request under the heading "# gtsummary (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (seeNEWS.mdfor examples).usethis::use_version(which = "dev")usethis::use_spell_check()again