Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Support running SQL models on Google Cloud Dataproc Serverless #1131

Open
3 tasks done
gddezero opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gddezero
Copy link

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt-spark functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

Context

Google Cloud Dataproc Serverless lets you run Spark workloads without requiring you to provision and manage your own Dataproc cluster. Use the Google Cloud console, Google Cloud CLI, or Dataproc API to submit a batch workload to the Dataproc Serverless service. The service will run the workload on a managed compute infrastructure, autoscaling resources as needed.

Dataproc Serverless is widely used for GCP customers to build data pipelines. A typical use case is submitting Spark SQL jobs to Dataproc Serverless to transform data and build data warehouse.

Current Status

dbt only supports submitting SQL models using Spark thrift server. User need to deploy a Dataproc Cluster, start thrift server and manage the infrastructures underneath.

Request

Support running SQL models on Dataproc Serverless.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Who will this benefit?

No response

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

No response

Anything else?

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants