Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] transient dynamic tables #1089

Open
3 tasks done
homerunner-mqp opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[Feature] transient dynamic tables #1089

homerunner-mqp opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
dynamic_tables enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@homerunner-mqp
Copy link

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt-snowflake functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

Could we implement the "transient" table config to dynamic tables? Follows same pattern as for tables.
https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/sql/create-dynamic-table

Describe alternatives you've considered

None.

Who will this benefit?

For cases of dynamic tables as output from a data warehouse, it could decrease cost.

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

Possibly

Anything else?

No response

@bpruss
Copy link

bpruss commented Sep 25, 2024

I just realized that transient dynamic tables will make a huge difference in our failsafe storage.

@andreasbjorshol
Copy link

I just realized that transient dynamic tables will make a huge difference in our failsafe storage.

I have noticed the same. This would make a huge difference and is in line with Snowflake's recommendation for dynamic tables with high refresh throughput.

@jhsb25
Copy link

jhsb25 commented Oct 16, 2024

working on this #1210

@jhsb25
Copy link

jhsb25 commented Oct 18, 2024

waiting for approval but #1210 is good to merge

@jhsb25
Copy link

jhsb25 commented Oct 21, 2024

@dataders can I get an approval on #1210

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dynamic_tables enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants