Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Add support for iceberg materialisations #1370

Open
3 tasks done
borjavb opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1371
Open
3 tasks done

[Feature] Add support for iceberg materialisations #1370

borjavb opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1371
Labels
enhancement New feature or request iceberg

Comments

@borjavb
Copy link

borjavb commented Oct 15, 2024

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt-bigquery functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

Bigquery has announced support for native Iceberg Tables

dbt-bigquery should support materialising a model as a native iceberg table.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Who will this benefit?

dbt users who want their models available as parquet files in storage they control
dbt users who want an easy way to interoperate with non-dbt systems that use the iceberg table format
dbt users who want direct access and control over the underlying storage of their data

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

yes

Anything else?

No response

@borjavb borjavb added enhancement New feature or request triage labels Oct 15, 2024
@borjavb borjavb linked a pull request Oct 15, 2024 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request iceberg
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants