You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our changelog entries are great for end-user facing changelogs, but for programmatic consumers of dbt-adapters (e.g. dbt-core) -- they do not always accurately signal what kind of interface changes are occurring and possibly breaking. Ideally, this is communicated via the versioning of dbt-common, but the person releasing dbt-common needs to know what version to release!
To that end, we'd like to introduce a lightweight CI check that would be required on any PR to dbt-adapters. The CI check would require one of release_type: major, release_type: minor, release_type: patch labels to be applied to the PR prior to merging. That way, the person releasing dbt-common could pick the highest release type among a set of changes and infer the version to release of dbt-common.
Context
No response
Acceptance criteria
Introduce a required CI check on PRs that passes if one of release_type: major, release_type: minor, release_type: patch labels exists, and fails otherwise
Testing
Manual testing for CI check
Security
N/A
Docs
N/A
Consequences
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Housekeeping
dbt-adapters
Short description
Our changelog entries are great for end-user facing changelogs, but for programmatic consumers of dbt-adapters (e.g. dbt-core) -- they do not always accurately signal what kind of interface changes are occurring and possibly breaking. Ideally, this is communicated via the versioning of dbt-common, but the person releasing dbt-common needs to know what version to release!
To that end, we'd like to introduce a lightweight CI check that would be required on any PR to dbt-adapters. The CI check would require one of release_type: major, release_type: minor, release_type: patch labels to be applied to the PR prior to merging. That way, the person releasing dbt-common could pick the highest release type among a set of changes and infer the version to release of dbt-common.
Context
No response
Acceptance criteria
Introduce a required CI check on PRs that passes if one of release_type: major, release_type: minor, release_type: patch labels exists, and fails otherwise
Testing
Manual testing for CI check
Security
N/A
Docs
N/A
Consequences
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: